Metallica - 05-06-2008 Rock In Rio- Portugal [PRO]

[mastcad]

Artist:
Metallica

Show or Bootleg Title:
05-06-2008 Rock In Rio- Portugal [PRO]

Show Venue:
Rock In Rio- Portugal

Source:
Video - Pro Shot DVD

Video Quality/Production Info:
A+

Audio/Video Specs:
Video Attributes:
Video compression mode: MPEG-2
TV system: 625/50 (PAL)
Aspect Ratio: 4:3
Display Mode: Both Pan&scan and Letterbox
Source picture resolution: 720x576 (625/50)
Frame Rate: 25.00
Source picture letterboxed: Not letterboxed
Bitrate: 4.56Mbps

Audio Attributes:
Audio Coding mode: Dolby Digital
Sampling Rate: 48kHz
Audio application mode: Not specified
Number of Audio channels: 2
Bitrate: 256 Kbps
Number of Audio streams: 1

Format:
PAL

Set List/Chapters:
Setlist:
Creeping Death
Fuel
Harvester Of Sorrow
Bleeding Me
King Nothing
No Remorse
Devil’s Dance
(Welcome Home) Sanitarium
Master Of Puppets
Damage Inc.
Nothing Else Matters
Sand But True
One
Enter Sandman
Last Caress
So What?
Seek and Destroy

96256 04:17.24 2008-07-27 VTS_01_0.IFO
55191552 04:59.20 2008-07-27 VTS_01_0.VOB
1073565696 12:49.26 2008-07-27 VTS_01_1.VOB
1073565696 12:56.28 2008-07-27 VTS_01_2.VOB
1073565696 12:56.28 2008-07-27 VTS_01_3.VOB
1073565696 12:56.06 2008-07-27 VTS_01_4.VOB
858673152 12:56.28 2008-07-27 VTS_01_5.VOB
14336 04:10.22 2008-07-27 VIDEO_TS.BUP
14336 04:10.22 2008-07-27 VIDEO_TS.IFO
13799424 04:17.24 2008-07-27 VIDEO_TS.VOB
96256 04:17.24 2008-07-27 VTS_01_0.BUP

great show

[petbur]

"anyways this will probably get pulled cause of that and im sorry i don have them."

Why upload something that you know is gonna get pulled?

[ron]

There are many applications that can generate MD5 sums these days. You need to use one of them to do this, then update your first post with the details.

[Taragon]

Thank you !!

[mastcad]

Thank you !!

no problem, my connection is slow due to comcrap...:drunk:

[camiva]

thanks:yay:

[j3s]

Appears to be the same show that was upped to Zomb (and subsequently pulled) not too long ago. FWIW, the original poster there never provided an MD5 either. Not sure if it will get pulled here, but the files check out, so I'll go ahead and jump on this to help seed for now.

[ImNraged]

Thanks!

[Heubner]

thanks alot!!

[ron]

I see that instead of the MD5's, the OP has added file sizes and dates. Of course that's not what we're looking for. Yes, this one will be pulled soon if we don't get the MD5's.
If you are concerned about your share ratio, I'd stay away.

[petbur]

I see that instead of the MD5's, the OP has added file sizes and dates. Of course that's not what we're looking for. Yes, this one will be pulled soon if we don't get the MD5's.
If you are concerned about your share ratio, I'd stay away.

'soon' as in: when a few people are already done downloading? It's getting more and more confusing at JTT.

[ron]

'soon' as in: when a few people are already done downloading? It's getting more and more confusing at JTT.
We here at JTT give people a grace period in which to get problems like this resolved rather than just pulling a torrent and having people get frustrated.

There have been multiple warnings in this thread about it getting pulled (including from the OP themselves!) That should be more than enough notice to people to STAY AWAY from this torrent until it gets fixed. If people choose to ignore those warnings, their ratio will suffer if this gets pulled.

It might just be me, but it seems like common sense not to join a torrent that isn't right and has the potential to be pulled....

[petbur]

I see your point Ron, about people not jumping on a torrent that's on the edge of getting pulled. On the other hand, with plenty of incomplete torrents here on JTT in the last couple of months (that had to be pulled because the required info wasn't given even after pointed out) why not change it a bit? On Dime or TTD the torrent gets banned, and un-banned after the missing info is provided. That way JTT doesn't get poluted. Anyway, just my thoughts...

[ron]

I see your point Ron, about people not jumping on a torrent that's on the edge of getting pulled. On the other hand, with plenty of incomplete torrents here on JTT in the last couple of months (that had to be pulled because the required info wasn't given even after pointed out) why not change it a bit? On Dime or TTD the torrent gets banned, and un-banned after the missing info is provided. That way JTT doesn't get poluted. Anyway, just my thoughts...
It has been my experience here that the majority of seeders will not fix anything and will not return after a torrent has been pulled. However, if given the chance to fix a problem with the information and given help on how to do it, most will get things fixed and the torrent will continue, resulting in happy people (most of the time).

If you feel strongly about immediately pulling torrents with bad/missing info, please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page to let Brett know. I guess I don't mind either way, but I think JTT is more helpful to first time seeders in its current configuration.

[philipdocker]

interesting idea from Petbur.

My 2 cents is (still) when a new post is started - it should get the greenlight from a moderator.

That would save all the messed up ratios (when you download 3 gig and then have to bin it - but it still gets taken to account on the ratio!).

Also will stop a lot of the people who try and seed bad quality footage.

Stamp out those issues before they get put online.

If the mods can not cope with vetting the (I dont know how many!) new torrents - then add another couple of moderators.

[ron]

My 2 cents is (still) when a new post is started - it should get the greenlight from a moderator.
If you feel strongly about your idea, please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page to let Brett know.